Challenges of Migrating Data from On-Premise ERP to Cloud

How Q6 DMLM Reduces Risk and Adds Control

Migrating data from on-premise ERP systems to cloud-based platforms is a strategic move that promises agility, cost efficiency, and modernization. However, these projects are often complex, risky, and prone to delays without strong oversight and governance. Below, we break down the most pressing migration challenges—and demonstrate how the Q6 Data Migration Lifecycle Management (Q6 DMLM) App alleviates these problems by introducing visibility, accountability, and structured repeatability.

1. Data Integrity and Quality Issues

  • The Problem:
    Legacy ERP systems hold years of unclean duplicates, inconsistencies, and incompatible formats across departments. These issues risk data corruption, loss, or regulatory noncompliance post-migration.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 allows you to define data quality validation steps, assign responsible roles (e.g., Migration Consultant, Data Owner), and track results against minimum pass-rate thresholds. Each data object’s load session is governed by Q6, with measurable success/failure status-eliminating ambiguity around “what passed” and “what needs fixing.”

2. Compatibility and Legacy System Limitations

  • The Problem:
    Older systems are often monolithic and not designed for the cloud. Migration may require custom code, middleware, or architectural redesign.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 facilitates system profiling by grouping migration objects under logical systems and subdomains. This allows early visibility into complexity and dependencies. Compatibility issues can be addressed upfront in early-phase milestones, with steps allocated to legacy experts for deep analysis before ETL even begins.

3. Complexity of Data Volume and Transfer

  • The Problem:
    Large volumes of ERP data across multiple systems make performance and scheduling unpredictable, especially when using network-based transfers.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 enables volume-based scoping of migration objects, supports phased cutover strategies, and testing of parallel vs. serial loads. You can simulate timelines, assign load responsibilities, and use earlier phases (e.g., “Mock 0”) to pilot small data sets before full-scale transfers begin.

4. Security and Compliance Concerns

  • The Problem:
    Moving sensitive ERP data to shared cloud environments requires airtight control over who accesses what, and when.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 structures project roles using RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed), and enforces profile-based task assignments. Governance steps such as encryption checks, access audits, and regulatory validation (e.g., for GDPR or HIPAA) can be included as non-negotiable milestones—each with assigned approvers and audit evidence tracking.

5. Organizational Resistance and Change Management

  • The Problem:
    Human resistance is often underestimated. Migration without broad buy-in leads to slow adoption and delayed cutovers.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 promotes role transparency, letting users see their responsibilities clearly at each step. You can identify blockers, engage business owners as early approvers, and even use Q6’s sandbox ("START") environment to simulate training or change impact for cloud champions or business users.

6. Cost Management and Hidden Expenses

  • The Problem:
    Cloud cost models are complex and dynamic. Overprovisioning, excessive storage, or prolonged hybrid states can erode ROI.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 doesn't predict cloud spend, but it does prevent scope creep by forcing step-level accountability. It also logs all change activity—highlighting effort, delays, or repeat cycles. That makes it easier to identify where human or technical inefficiencies are bloating the project and where to streamline.

7. Lack of Clear Planning and Strategy

  • The Problem:
    Without a clear roadmap, ERP cloud migration efforts get bogged down in analysis paralysis, scope creep, and missed timelines.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 enforces phase-driven planning, with defined milestones and pre-built templates. Strategy isn’t theoretical - it’s executable. You define the validation criteria, link all actions to team profiles, and sequence every task. Q6 makes abstract strategy concrete and traceable.

8. Skills Shortages and Expertise Gaps

  • The Problem:
    Lack of in-house knowledge, especially around data governance, mapping, and target ERP design, slows down delivery and increases reliance on external consultants.
  • Q6 Solution:
    Q6 enables collaboration between internal and external teams through secure role-based access to a shared platform. Migration consultants and developers can own different phases, while business analysts and approvers sign off on scope and outcomes. Even if skills are distributed, governance remains centralized.

Conclusion: Governing the Chaos with Q6 DMLM

Most ERP-to-cloud migration failures don’t happen because of technology—they fail because of misalignment, poor planning, and unclear responsibility.

Q6 DMLM doesn't replace your ETL tools or developers. It governs the lifecycle from initial scoping, data quality design, validation, and reconciliation through to final cutover. It gives stakeholders clarity, enforces process, and tracks accountability.

✅ Want to prevent costly delays and compliance failures?
✅ Want to track who’s responsible for each data object’s readiness?
✅ Want to simulate, improve, and execute mock cycles with control?

Use Q6 DMLM to make your ERP data migration manageable, auditable, and successful!

Q6 DM SOFTWARE LTD. Registered in England & Wales No. 11852571

©Copyright 2025. All rights reserved.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.